Head-to-head
PrimeSportsFunded vs LetMeBet
PrimeSportsFunded and LetMeBet compared row by row on 16 criteria taken from our verified reviews. No estimated figures: when a data point is missing, the row stays empty.
PrimeSportsFunded
French prop firm, single-phase evaluation with no time limit, capital from 5 000 $ to 100 000 $.
LetMeBet
Two-phase evaluation at +20% each (30 days per phase), capital from 5 000 € to 100 000 €, the lowest entry prices in the comparison.
4 criteria for PrimeSportsFunded4 criteria for LetMeBet1 tie
On scored rows only (max or min). Informational criteria do not count.
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay. Our interests in the platforms are detailed on the page Transparency.
Reviews verified on 13 September 2026Row by row
The head-to-head, criterion by criterion
Drawdown is the maximum tolerated loss: the wider the allowance, the more tolerant the rule. The target is the profit to reach: the lower it is, the less demanding the challenge.
Best value on the row
| Criterion | PrimeSportsFunded | LetMeBet |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 8.0 / 10 Best | 6.7 / 10 |
| Max capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 100 000 $US | 100 000 € |
| Min capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 5 000 $US | 5 000 € |
| Entry price | 109 € | 97 € Best |
| Profit target | +35 % | +20 % Best |
| Overall drawdown | -20 % Best | -15 % |
| Daily drawdown | -10 % Tie | -10 % |
| Evaluation phases | 1 phase Best | 2 phases |
| Challenge durationInformational criterion, not scored. | No time limit | 30 days per phase |
| Minimum betsInformational criterion, not scored. | 25 | 25 |
| Allowed stakeInformational criterion, not scored. | 2–5% of the capital | 1–10% of the bankroll |
| Profit split | 80–90 % Best | 80 % |
| Demo account | No | Yes Best |
| Capital currencyInformational criterion, not scored. | US dollar ($) | Euro (€) |
| Company countryInformational criterion, not scored. | France | Hong Kong |
| Trustpilot score | 4.2 / 5 | 4.5 / 5 Best |
Overall score
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 8.0 / 10 Best
- LetMeBet
- 6.7 / 10
Max capital
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 100 000 $US
- LetMeBet
- 100 000 €
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Min capital
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 5 000 $US
- LetMeBet
- 5 000 €
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Entry price
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 109 €
- LetMeBet
- 97 € Best
Profit target
- PrimeSportsFunded
- +35 %
- LetMeBet
- +20 % Best
Overall drawdown
- PrimeSportsFunded
- -20 % Best
- LetMeBet
- -15 %
Daily drawdown
Tie- PrimeSportsFunded
- -10 %
- LetMeBet
- -10 %
Evaluation phases
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 1 phase Best
- LetMeBet
- 2 phases
Challenge duration
- PrimeSportsFunded
- No time limit
- LetMeBet
- 30 days per phase
Informational criterion, not scored.
Minimum bets
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 25
- LetMeBet
- 25
Informational criterion, not scored.
Allowed stake
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 2–5% of the capital
- LetMeBet
- 1–10% of the bankroll
Informational criterion, not scored.
Profit split
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 80–90 % Best
- LetMeBet
- 80 %
Demo account
- PrimeSportsFunded
- No
- LetMeBet
- Yes Best
Capital currency
- PrimeSportsFunded
- US dollar ($)
- LetMeBet
- Euro (€)
Informational criterion, not scored.
Company country
- PrimeSportsFunded
- France
- LetMeBet
- Hong Kong
Informational criterion, not scored.
Trustpilot score
- PrimeSportsFunded
- 4.2 / 5
- LetMeBet
- 4.5 / 5 Best
Respective strengths
What each platform does better
Where PrimeSportsFunded wins
- Overall score. Higher overall score: 8.0 / 10 vs 6.7 / 10
- Overall drawdown. More tolerant overall drawdown: -20 % vs -15 %
- Evaluation phases. Fewer evaluation phases: 1 phase vs 2 phases
- Profit split. More favourable profit split: 80–90 % vs 80 %
Where LetMeBet wins
- Entry price. Lower entry price: 97 € vs 109 €
- Profit target. Less demanding target: +20 % vs +35 %
- Demo account. Demo account available: Yes vs No
- Trustpilot score. Higher Trustpilot score: 4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5
Our reading
PrimeSportsFunded or LetMeBet: which profile?
PrimeSportsFunded
PrimeSportsFunded may suit a bettor who values a higher overall score in our grid (8.0 / 10 vs 6.7 / 10), a wider overall loss allowance (-20 % vs -15 %), an evaluation with fewer steps (1 phase vs 2 phases) and a more favourable profit split (80–90 % vs 80 %).
LetMeBet
LetMeBet may suit a bettor who values a lower entry price (97 € vs 109 €), a less demanding profit target (+20 % vs +35 %), the option to practise on a demo account before buying and a better Trustpilot score (4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5).
PrimeSportsFunded + LetMeBet
PrimeSportsFunded and LetMeBet share several identical rules: daily drawdown (-10 %) and minimum bets (25). The two platforms also differ on points we do not score: max capital (100 000 $US vs 100 000 €), min capital (5 000 $US vs 5 000 €), challenge duration (no time limit vs 30 days per phase), allowed stake (2–5% of the capital vs 1–10% of the bankroll), capital currency (US dollar ($) vs Euro (€)) and company country (France vs Hong Kong). In both cases the challenge is paid and failure remains possible: read each platform's full rules before buying.
Go further
Full reviews and tools
Frequently asked questions about PrimeSportsFunded vs LetMeBet
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay. Our interests in the platforms are detailed on the page Transparency.