Head-to-head
LetMeBet vs WagerFunding
LetMeBet and WagerFunding compared row by row on 16 criteria taken from our verified reviews. No estimated figures: when a data point is missing, the row stays empty.
LetMeBet
Two-phase evaluation at +20% each (30 days per phase), capital from 5 000 € to 100 000 €, the lowest entry prices in the comparison.
WagerFunding
US prop firm: one- or two-phase challenges at +20% with no time limit, capital from 1 000 $ to 100 000 $, from 39 $.
3 criteria for LetMeBet0 criterion for WagerFunding4 ties
On scored rows only (max or min). Informational criteria do not count.
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay.
Reviews verified on 14 September 2026Row by row
The head-to-head, criterion by criterion
Drawdown is the maximum tolerated loss: the wider the allowance, the more tolerant the rule. The target is the profit to reach: the lower it is, the less demanding the challenge.
Best value on the row
| Criterion | LetMeBet | WagerFunding |
|---|---|---|
| Overall score | 7.2 / 10 Best | 6.9 / 10 |
| Max capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 100 000 € | 100 000 $US |
| Min capitalAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 5 000 € | 1 000 $US |
| Entry priceAmounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored. | 97 € | 39 $US |
| Profit target | +20 % Tie | +20 % |
| Overall drawdown | -15 % Best | -10 % |
| Daily drawdown | -10 % Tie | -10 % |
| Evaluation phases | 2 phases Tie | 2 phases |
| Challenge durationInformational criterion, not scored. | 30 days per phase | No time limit |
| Minimum betsInformational criterion, not scored. | 25 | 20 |
| Allowed stakeInformational criterion, not scored. | 1–10% of the bankroll | 1–5% of the capital |
| Profit split | 80 % Tie | 80 % |
| Demo account | — | — |
| Capital currencyInformational criterion, not scored. | Euro (€) | US dollar ($) |
| Company countryInformational criterion, not scored. | Hong Kong | United States |
| Trustpilot score | 4.5 / 5 Best | 4.2 / 5 |
Overall score
- LetMeBet
- 7.2 / 10 Best
- WagerFunding
- 6.9 / 10
Max capital
- LetMeBet
- 100 000 €
- WagerFunding
- 100 000 $US
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Min capital
- LetMeBet
- 5 000 €
- WagerFunding
- 1 000 $US
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Entry price
- LetMeBet
- 97 €
- WagerFunding
- 39 $US
Amounts are quoted in two different currencies: this row is not scored.
Profit target
Tie- LetMeBet
- +20 %
- WagerFunding
- +20 %
Overall drawdown
- LetMeBet
- -15 % Best
- WagerFunding
- -10 %
Daily drawdown
Tie- LetMeBet
- -10 %
- WagerFunding
- -10 %
Evaluation phases
Tie- LetMeBet
- 2 phases
- WagerFunding
- 2 phases
Challenge duration
- LetMeBet
- 30 days per phase
- WagerFunding
- No time limit
Informational criterion, not scored.
Minimum bets
- LetMeBet
- 25
- WagerFunding
- 20
Informational criterion, not scored.
Allowed stake
- LetMeBet
- 1–10% of the bankroll
- WagerFunding
- 1–5% of the capital
Informational criterion, not scored.
Profit split
Tie- LetMeBet
- 80 %
- WagerFunding
- 80 %
Demo account
- LetMeBet
- —
- WagerFunding
- —
Capital currency
- LetMeBet
- Euro (€)
- WagerFunding
- US dollar ($)
Informational criterion, not scored.
Company country
- LetMeBet
- Hong Kong
- WagerFunding
- United States
Informational criterion, not scored.
Trustpilot score
- LetMeBet
- 4.5 / 5 Best
- WagerFunding
- 4.2 / 5
Respective strengths
What each platform does better
Where LetMeBet wins
- Overall score. Higher overall score: 7.2 / 10 vs 6.9 / 10
- Overall drawdown. More tolerant overall drawdown: -15 % vs -10 %
- Trustpilot score. Higher Trustpilot score: 4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5
Where WagerFunding wins
On the scored criteria of our reviews, WagerFunding does not take the lead on any row against LetMeBet.
Our reading
LetMeBet or WagerFunding: which profile?
LetMeBet
LetMeBet may suit a bettor who values a higher overall score in our grid (7.2 / 10 vs 6.9 / 10), a wider overall loss allowance (-15 % vs -10 %) and a better Trustpilot score (4.5 / 5 vs 4.2 / 5).
WagerFunding
On the scored criteria, WagerFunding does not stand out against LetMeBet. Its appeal depends on points we do not score (capital currency, country, challenge duration, stake rules), detailed in the full review.
LetMeBet + WagerFunding
LetMeBet and WagerFunding share several identical rules: profit target (+20 %), daily drawdown (-10 %), evaluation phases (2 phases) and profit split (80 %). The two platforms also differ on points we do not score: max capital (100 000 € vs 100 000 $US), min capital (5 000 € vs 1 000 $US), entry price (97 € vs 39 $US), challenge duration (30 days per phase vs no time limit), minimum bets (25 vs 20), allowed stake (1–10% of the bankroll vs 1–5% of the capital), capital currency (Euro (€) vs US dollar ($)) and company country (Hong Kong vs United States). In both cases the challenge is paid and failure remains possible: read each platform's full rules before buying.
Go further
Full reviews and tools
Frequently asked questions about LetMeBet vs WagerFunding
Some links are affiliate links: we may earn a commission if you subscribe to an offer, with no impact on our rankings or on the price you pay.